Severance pay — Ontario Employment Law
See all 69 cases that mention severance pay
Related Keywords
About Severance pay
In Ontario employment law, the term 'severance pay' can be confusing because it has two distinct meanings. Understanding the difference is crucial for any worker who has been terminated. The first type is statutory severance pay, a specific entitlement defined under Ontario's Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA). This is a mandatory payment for long-serving employees of larger companies. To qualify, an employee must have worked for the employer for five or more years, and the employer must have a global payroll of at least $2.5 million. The ESA formula for severance is one week's regular pay for each year of service (plus a pro-rated amount for a partial year), up to a maximum of 26 weeks. It's important to note this is separate from and in addition to statutory termination pay.
The second, and often more significant, type of severance is what's known as common law severance. This isn't a separate payment but rather represents the money an employer owes an employee when they fail to provide sufficient 'reasonable notice' of termination. This common law entitlement applies to almost all terminated employees, regardless of the employer's payroll size or the employee's length of service (unless the employee was fired for just cause). The amount is based on what a court would consider a reasonable period for the employee to find comparable new employment. This calculation considers factors like age, length of service, the character of the employment, and the availability of similar jobs. This amount is almost always substantially more than the ESA minimums. An employment contract may attempt to limit this common law entitlement, but such clauses are often found to be unenforceable. Because the calculation of common law severance is complex and depends heavily on individual circumstances, having any severance offer reviewed by a legal professional is a critical step in protecting your rights.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between severance pay and termination pay in Ontario?
Termination pay under the ESA is notice pay (up to 8 weeks) for most terminated employees. Severance pay under the ESA is an additional payment for employees with 5+ years of service at a company with a payroll of $2.5M or more. You can be entitled to both, and they are separate from much larger common law entitlements.
Do I get severance pay if I was only employed for 3 years?
You would not qualify for statutory severance pay under the Employment Standards Act, which requires 5 years of service. However, you are almost certainly entitled to common law severance (or reasonable notice), which is based on factors like your age, role, and the job market, not just years of service.
Is severance pay taxable income?
Yes, severance pay is considered income and is subject to income tax. However, if structured correctly as part of a settlement, some portions may be directed to an RRSP on a tax-deferred basis, or allocated to legal fees, which can reduce the immediate tax burden.
My employer's payroll is less than $2.5 million. Am I still entitled to severance?
While you won't be eligible for statutory severance pay under the ESA's specific rules, you are still entitled to common law reasonable notice or pay in lieu of notice. This common law severance is often significantly more than the ESA minimums.
Is there a deadline to sue for more severance pay?
Yes. In Ontario, you generally have two years from the date of your termination to file a legal claim for wrongful dismissal to seek your full common law severance entitlement. It is crucial to act well before this deadline expires.
My severance offer only includes the minimums required by the ESA. Should I consult a lawyer?
Almost always, yes. An offer limited to ESA minimums often represents only a fraction of what you may be entitled to at common law. A lawyer can assess your situation and advise if the offer is fair or if you have grounds to negotiate for a significantly better package.
Common Scenarios
- A 55-year-old director with 15 years of service at a large bank is terminated without cause and offered 23 weeks of pay, covering both their ESA termination and severance pay entitlements, but failing to address their much larger common law notice period.
- An employee with 6 years of service at a tech company with a global payroll of $3 million is let go and only offered 6 weeks of termination pay, with the employer incorrectly claiming they don't owe severance pay.
- A 40-year-old skilled tradesperson is part of a mass layoff of 60 employees from a manufacturing plant and is unsure how this affects their severance pay calculation under the ESA.
- An employee signs an employment contract with a clause limiting severance to ESA minimums, but upon termination, discovers the clause may be legally unenforceable, potentially entitling them to common law damages.
What You Should Know
- Do not sign a Release or severance offer without having it reviewed. Once signed, you give up your right to pursue any further claims against your employer.
- Understand the two sources of severance: the Employment Standards Act (ESA) provides a minimum floor, while the common law often provides a much higher ceiling.
- Gather your key documents, including your employment agreement, termination letter, and recent pay stubs, as these are essential for calculating your full entitlements.
- Remember that you have a duty to mitigate your losses by looking for new work, but this does not negate your employer's obligation to provide proper severance.
- Consulting with an employment law expert can help you understand the true value of your claim, as the initial offer from an employer is rarely their best one.
Featured Cases
Johnstone v. Loblaw
2025 ONSC 4755 (CanLII) · 2025-08-18Employment Dispute: Settlement Agreement and Summary Judgment
A civil procedure case involving the interpretation of a settlement agreement and the admissibility of an affidavit in an employment dispute. The court determined whether the agreement was binding and whether a release clause barred claims related to a failed house purchase. Summary judgment was deemed appropriate to resolve the dispute.
Flammia v. Royal Glen Eagle
2014 ONSC 7522 (CanLII) · 2014-12-17Severance Payments and Damages Deductibility in Employment Disputes
A case involving severance payments and their deductibility from damages for loss of income. The court considered whether severance payments should be deducted from damages for past and future loss of income, and whether these payments fall under the private insurance exception to the rule against double recovery.
Sidhu v. Affinia Canada Corporation
2010 ONSC 2829 (CanLII) · 2010-05-14Severance Agreements and Union Representation in Employment Law
A court ruled that the Superior Court did not have jurisdiction to hear disputes related to severance and termination payments under a collective agreement, affirming that such disputes must be resolved through grievance/arbitration processes. The case also addressed the union's duty of fair representation, which is also within the realm of employment law.
Davenport v. Hudson's Bay Company
2006 CanLII 31299 (ON SC) · 2006-09-11Severance Entitlements: Employee Entitled to Full RSU Payout Under Change of Control Provision
A severance entitlements case involving the interpretation of a 'change of control' provision in an employee stock option plan. The court held that the provision is clear, mandatory, and unconditional, and that it overrides the 'termination without cause' provision, entitling the employee to a full payout of restricted share units (RSUs) vested during the severance period.
Adamson v. Murray Axmith & associates Ltd.
2005 CanLII 5481 (ON SC) · 2005-03-08Severance Pay: Related Businesses and Payroll Threshold Under ESA
A severance pay case involving the interpretation of the Employment Standards Act (ESA) to determine whether the defendant and its Ontario agents constitute 'associated or related activities' and whether the combined payroll meets the $2.5 million threshold. The court applied an expansive interpretation of the ESA to treat the entities as a single employer and found the threshold was met, entitling the plaintiff to severance pay. Prejudgment interest was also awarded from the statutory due date.
Andrews v. Ottawa community housing Corp.
2003 CanLII 23361 (ON SC) · 2003-06-02Severance Pay Dispute: Interpretation of Contractual Provisions
A dispute over the calculation of severance pay under an employment contract, focusing on whether the applicant is entitled to 18 months or 25 months of pay under article 4.1.7. The court determined that the plain meaning of the contract prevails and that benefits and allowances are excluded from the 'regular rate of pay' as defined in the contract.
Robinson v. Kilby
1993 CanLII 16062 (ON SC) · 1993-02-12Severance Pay Case: Civil Procedure and Pleadings
A case involving severance pay, with procedural aspects related to pleadings in a civil procedure context.
Susan Shoe Industries Ltd. v. Ricciardi
1991 CanLII 7321 (ON SC) · 1991-11-22Severance Pay Dispute: Res Judicata and Employment Standards Act
A merits decision involving a dispute over severance pay where an employee was awarded six months' notice under a written contract, but the court dismissed the statutory severance pay claim. The employee later received severance pay from an employment standards officer, and the case examines whether res judicata prevents reconsideration of the claim. The court also addressed whether statutory severance pay can override contractual notice provisions and the jurisdiction of employment standards officers.
Wood v. Indal Technologies Inc. (H.C.J.)
1990 CanLII 6705 (ON SC) · 1990-06-06Severance Pay Dispute: 23-Year Employee's 15-Month Agreement Interpreted to Include Statutory Payments
A merits decision involving an employee terminated without cause after 23 years of service, who disputed whether statutory severance payments should be added to the agreed 15-month salary continuation period. The court interpreted the termination agreement to include statutory payments within the 15-month period, upholding the employer’s interpretation as consistent with contractual and statutory terms.